This activity requires 30-60 minutes.
Purpose:
The purpose of this activity is to engage teachers in a process of collaborative problem-solving around multicultural issues through the use of case studies. Participants will develop an understanding and appreciation for the necessity to include a variety of voices and perspectives to successfully address issues that arise around race, gender, culture, sexual orientation, or any other identity dimension. They will also begin to better understand the collaborative process and how they tend to participate in it. This activity can also be a useful springboard into conversations about specific issues drawn from the cases or case studies.
Preparation:
The first step in preparing for this activity is finding one or more cases or case studies about specific instances of cultural conflict in schools. These cases can come from news reports, film clips, or any other media that details the specifics of a particular incident or series of incidents in a school setting. Another excellent source for cases is a collection of the personal experiences of your students. Consider having each student bring a short write-up of a cultural conflict they experienced or witnessed at a school, especially if it was not resolved successfully. Whatever source you choose, make sure every participant has read, watched, or otherwise become familiar with the case. Click here for an example of a case in the form of a series of journal entries.
Circulate the hand-out entitled "A Collaborative Model for Addressing Conflict in Schools." You can print a copy of this hand-out here.
Before beginning the process of working through the model, review, in detail, the steps of the model with participants.
Instructions:
Facilitator Notes:
As stated above, this can also be a useful activity for easing into dialogue about specific issues such as race, gender, class, or sexual orientation. You might also consider combining it with a story-telling activity so that the stories of the people in the class become the cases.
The processing of this activity can include an additional dimension of depth if you break participants into small groups, asking each group to go through the entire process. After doing so, each group can share their work, and a conversation about the different results can emerge. This can also lead to a discussion about how people participated in the small groups. Did somebody try to take the lead? Was anyone's voice silenced? What did people in the group do to ensure that everyone's voice was heard?
[ Return to the Awareness Activities Page ]